This is an old revision of the document!
Where Should You Buy Machine Vision Components Without Compromising Reliability? Procurement decisions in machine vision carry more long-term risk than in many other automation categories because components must remain compatible across firmware updates, driver versions, and mechanical tolerances for years after installation. Working with authorized distributors or established integrators who stock genuine components with full documentation and warranty support reduces the risk of receiving gray-market hardware with mismatched firmware or voided manufacturer support. This is particularly relevant when sourcing cameras and lenses in volume for multi-line rollouts, where a single incompatible firmware revision across fifty cameras can halt an entire commissioning schedule.
The practical result is that a feature sitting 2mm higher on a part will measure at the same apparent size and position as an identical feature at the nominal height, provided both remain within the lens's specified depth of field. This is why advanced machine vision systems vision lenses built on telecentric principles are the default choice for metrology applications where absolute dimensional accuracy - not just repeatability - determines whether a part passes quality control. The trade-off is that telecentric lenses typically have a fixed field of view close to the diameter of the front optical element, meaning a lens covering a 50mm field of view will physically require front glass close to that diameter, which increases size, weight, and cost compared to an entocentric lens of similar focal length.
Choosing Interface Types: GigE, USB3, and Camera Link Trade-offs Interface selection affects resource allocation in ways that are easy to underestimate. GigE Vision cameras are convenient for long cable runs and multi-camera networking but consume Ethernet bandwidth that must be shared with PLC traffic, HMI data, and other network services if not properly segmented. USB3 Vision offers lower latency and simpler point-to-point wiring but is less suited to camera counts beyond a handful per host due to bus bandwidth limits. Camera Link and CoaXPress remain preferred for the highest-speed applications, such as web inspection on continuous material lines, because they offload transfer overhead from the general-purpose network entirely, though at the cost of specialized frame grabber hardware and shorter cable distances.
Why Does Parallax Error Happen in Standard Machine Vision Lenses? Conventional entocentric lenses, the type found in most general-purpose machine vision cameras, work like the human eye: light rays converge toward a single point, meaning the angle of view changes across the field. An object closer to the lens appears larger than an identical object farther away, and a three-dimensional feature - a raised boss, a chamfered edge, a component with variable height - will appear to shift position or size depending on exactly where it sits within the depth of field. This is the essence of parallax: the apparent size or position of a feature depends on its distance from the lens, not just its true physical dimension.
With optimised settings - cooled InGaAs sensor, telecentric lens at f/8, and a model trained on at least 5,000 EL images - detection rates for cracks ≥3 mm are 97-99.5%. Cracks shorter than 1 mm remain challenging and may require sub-resolution imaging or a different modality such as PL with a laser spot size under 50 µm.
It depends heavily on task mix rather than camera count alone. A line with mostly presence and dimensional checks may run comfortably on a single entry-level GPU shared across four to six cameras, while a line with two or more deep-learning cosmetic inspections often needs a dedicated mid-range GPU per two to three such stations to maintain cycle time.
Choosing the right lens configuration for a given line involves weighing several interdependent factors at once, and engineers typically evaluate a short list of criteria before committing to a purchase order:
In a controlled laboratory setting, this might be a minor inconvenience. On a factory floor, where parts arrive with slight tilt, vibration, or height variation from fixture wear, parallax error compounds into real measurement uncertainty. Consider a connector pin inspection system checking for correct pin height across a 15mm field of view. If the entocentric lens has even a 2-degree angular field of view at the edges, a 0.5mm variation in pin height can translate into a measurable lateral position shift of several microns - enough to cause inconsistent pass/fail decisions on a gauge with 10-micron tolerance requirements.
A practical diagnostic is to move a known reference part to two or three different heights within your working range using shims and record the measured dimension at each height with your existing entocentric lens. If the measured size or position shifts consistently with height while lighting and part orientation stay constant, parallax error is very likely the dominant factor, and switching to a telecentric lens should resolve it.